Posts tagged politics

Friends United I’ve been following the campaigns for and against Scottish Independence ever since the referendum was passed and the date announced last year. It’s been interesting hearing the reasons for and against Scottish Independence and for me, as I’m sure for many others - the discussion has not just been about what it means to be Scottish, but what it means to be British. Both of my parents are Welsh, and although I feel a strong affinity with Wales, I was born and raised in England. My wife has a Scottish father and and English mother - so the baby we’re expecting in November will be a very British blend. The island that we live on is only small. You can fit the UK into Texas almost 3 times. For me, It is a nonsense to bisect this little land that we share. Scotland has it’s own wonderful cultural identity but reports that Scots and English are different are greatly exaggerated. As value sets go, ours are indistinguishable from each other. Scots are broadly conservative with a small ‘c’. Until the 1950s the Tories enjoyed a majority vote in Scotland. ‘Westminster Elite’ and ‘Tories’ get mentioned a lot by Alex Salmond and we are often reminded that Scots didn’t get the government they voted for - but let’s not forget that with the coalition government, nobody in the UK has the government they voted for! Only 36% of those who voted, voted for the Tories. In 1997, Scotland propelled New Labour to power and helped to keep them there for 3 terms. This is the nature of parliamentary democracy. Scotland brings political equilibrium to the UK. Without the Scottish Labour vote, the balance of power lurches significantly to the right for those who remain in what is left of The Union. Independence is something of an abandonment of Labour voters in England and will make it much easier for Tories to pass the post first in future elections. Great for Tories, but terrible for a strong opposition and blow to democracy.The other element of the separation that I find at odds with itself is the oil. I believe strongly that technology is moving far too fast and world changing far too quickly to rely on oil for a sustainable income, but that is a whole different discussion. British oil lies off the coast of Scotland in the North Sea. The Scots are being encouraged to ‘take what is theirs’ and start over. This presents a disparity with what we are told are Scottish values of justice and equality. It means taking one of our island’s natural resources and most significant economic assets all for themselves. Perhaps there needs to be redress on how those oil revenues are divided but to hoard this resource as ‘ours’ to benefit from it alone contradicts the core argument for moving apart for a ‘fairer’ society. It is Capitalism at it’s boldest.The world that we live in is shrinking constantly and it seems counter-intuitive on so many levels to divide our nation in two. The UK’s importance as a global power has been in decline throughout the 20th century but we have been finding ways of remaining relevant through our finance, science and tech industries. We have a promising future but Scottish Independence will be a critical hit to our standing. Our island will be on course to be one of the spectators of world events. Our combined strength in the last 300 years come from the ability to control and defend all our united coastline and airspace. We’ll rely increasingly on the US and France and Germany for our stability and safety.4 million Scots on this island of 63 million will decide the trajectory of all inhabitants of our nation. The pound is already dropping value at the looming prospect of Scottish Independence and the uncertainty in the delicate global economy could be perilous. I could write and write but my intention is just to make it clear that I am one of the Brits who is desperate for Scotland to remain. It can be very difficult to market for the status quo, but that is largely the task of the flawed, sometimes complacent ‘Better Together’ campaign. As a United Kingdom we do need greater regional powers and the concentration of political and economic power in London is in need of reform - but Scottish Independence is not the solution.The people on this island are not reluctant neighbours with conflicting values and different directions. We are family on a rock and we are inextricably linked. For better or worse we have a shared destiny and and I am in no doubt that we are stronger, smarter, more formidable, better together.Vote ‘No’ on September 18th. Please TL:DR: I love the United Kingdom. Don’t go, Scotland.

Friends United 

I’ve been following the campaigns for and against Scottish Independence ever since the referendum was passed and the date announced last year. It’s been interesting hearing the reasons for and against Scottish Independence and for me, as I’m sure for many others - the discussion has not just been about what it means to be Scottish, but what it means to be British. Both of my parents are Welsh, and although I feel a strong affinity with Wales, I was born and raised in England. My wife has a Scottish father and and English mother - so the baby we’re expecting in November will be a very British blend. 

The island that we live on is only small. You can fit the UK into Texas almost 3 times. For me, It is a nonsense to bisect this little land that we share. Scotland has it’s own wonderful cultural identity but reports that Scots and English are different are greatly exaggerated. As value sets go, ours are indistinguishable from each other. Scots are broadly conservative with a small ‘c’. Until the 1950s the Tories enjoyed a majority vote in Scotland. ‘Westminster Elite’ and ‘Tories’ get mentioned a lot by Alex Salmond and we are often reminded that Scots didn’t get the government they voted for - but let’s not forget that with the coalition government, nobody in the UK has the government they voted for! Only 36% of those who voted, voted for the Tories. In 1997, Scotland propelled New Labour to power and helped to keep them there for 3 terms. This is the nature of parliamentary democracy. Scotland brings political equilibrium to the UK. Without the Scottish Labour vote, the balance of power lurches significantly to the right for those who remain in what is left of The Union. Independence is something of an abandonment of Labour voters in England and will make it much easier for Tories to pass the post first in future elections. Great for Tories, but terrible for a strong opposition and blow to democracy.

The other element of the separation that I find at odds with itself is the oil. I believe strongly that technology is moving far too fast and world changing far too quickly to rely on oil for a sustainable income, but that is a whole different discussion. British oil lies off the coast of Scotland in the North Sea. The Scots are being encouraged to ‘take what is theirs’ and start over. This presents a disparity with what we are told are Scottish values of justice and equality. It means taking one of our island’s natural resources and most significant economic assets all for themselves. Perhaps there needs to be redress on how those oil revenues are divided but to hoard this resource as ‘ours’ to benefit from it alone contradicts the core argument for moving apart for a ‘fairer’ society. It is Capitalism at it’s boldest.

The world that we live in is shrinking constantly and it seems counter-intuitive on so many levels to divide our nation in two. The UK’s importance as a global power has been in decline throughout the 20th century but we have been finding ways of remaining relevant through our finance, science and tech industries. We have a promising future but Scottish Independence will be a critical hit to our standing. Our island will be on course to be one of the spectators of world events. Our combined strength in the last 300 years come from the ability to control and defend all our united coastline and airspace. We’ll rely increasingly on the US and France and Germany for our stability and safety.

4 million Scots on this island of 63 million will decide the trajectory of all inhabitants of our nation. The pound is already dropping value at the looming prospect of Scottish Independence and the uncertainty in the delicate global economy could be perilous. I could write and write but my intention is just to make it clear that I am one of the Brits who is desperate for Scotland to remain. It can be very difficult to market for the status quo, but that is largely the task of the flawed, sometimes complacent ‘Better Together’ campaign. As a United Kingdom we do need greater regional powers and the concentration of political and economic power in London is in need of reform - but Scottish Independence is not the solution.

The people on this island are not reluctant neighbours with conflicting values and different directions. We are family on a rock and we are inextricably linked. For better or worse we have a shared destiny and and I am in no doubt that we are stronger, smarter, more formidable, better together.

Vote ‘No’ on September 18th. Please 

TL:DR: I love the United Kingdom. Don’t go, Scotland.

London at War
I was thinking the other day about the incredible hardships suffered across the UK and in particular the city I live in and love. London was decimated by German bombing in World War II. Those men, women and children suffered and endured to protect the liberties and way of life they cherished and today, we in the West are tacitly surrendering those freedoms to our own governments without a second thought. I don’t mean to marginalise the horrible events in July 2005 or in Woolwich recently, but I’ve felt for a long time that we’ve lost our sense of perpective with terrorism.
I’ve always been concerned with the passive erosion of civil liberties but it’s come into sharp focus in the last few weeks with the revelation of the PRISM program. How can we accept that the government can read through our private correspondence and content? What does privacy mean to you? We’ve been encouraged for years now by our banks, telecoms and utilities companies to go ‘paperless’ for the sake of the environment. Giving up paper, it seems, just meant putting our sensitive personal financial information in the grasp of the surveillance agencies. The Politicians, military chiefs and media moguls tell us we’re at war with an invisible enemy and an ideology which practical terms can never be defeated. So this is it? Can we ever have that privacy back or are we to accept that this is what we concede so long as we can have the Nike and the Apple products we want. The safeguards put in place in law to protect our individual rights are increasingly circumnavigated by ‘essential’ National security measures.
"If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about". This is exactly the principle that the totalitarian states works on. I don’t know what else to say other than if you accept this, you accept that the illusion of freedom and assurances of safety from your government is more important to you than actual freedom. 
And just because we can’t imagine our current leaders have sinister intentions for such programs, what about the powerful lobbying groups that have their ear? What about 20 years from now if a popular protest vote puts a right wing political group in power and they have immediate, fully legal access to this state apparatus. How easily they could deal with their political opponents.
Those determined to do others harm will find a way. The current massive surveillance operation did not prevent the murder of Lee Rigby or the Boston Marathon bombing - and after these events, patriotic politicians readily agree with military intelligence chiefs telling us they need more concessions to our liberties in order to prevent future attacks. Then another attack happens and they tell us it might have been prevented if they had even more powers. Perhaps we are allowing ourselves to be terrorised. To me, it is the job of the security services and lawmakers to find and stop those individuals without altering the framework of our democracy. The scope of the PRISM project is so far beyond what we should accept from our governments and we need to get mad.

London at War

I was thinking the other day about the incredible hardships suffered across the UK and in particular the city I live in and love. London was decimated by German bombing in World War II. Those men, women and children suffered and endured to protect the liberties and way of life they cherished and today, we in the West are tacitly surrendering those freedoms to our own governments without a second thought. I don’t mean to marginalise the horrible events in July 2005 or in Woolwich recently, but I’ve felt for a long time that we’ve lost our sense of perpective with terrorism.

I’ve always been concerned with the passive erosion of civil liberties but it’s come into sharp focus in the last few weeks with the revelation of the PRISM program. How can we accept that the government can read through our private correspondence and content? What does privacy mean to you? We’ve been encouraged for years now by our banks, telecoms and utilities companies to go ‘paperless’ for the sake of the environment. Giving up paper, it seems, just meant putting our sensitive personal financial information in the grasp of the surveillance agencies. The Politicians, military chiefs and media moguls tell us we’re at war with an invisible enemy and an ideology which practical terms can never be defeated. So this is it? Can we ever have that privacy back or are we to accept that this is what we concede so long as we can have the Nike and the Apple products we want. The safeguards put in place in law to protect our individual rights are increasingly circumnavigated by ‘essential’ National security measures.

"If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about". This is exactly the principle that the totalitarian states works on. I don’t know what else to say other than if you accept this, you accept that the illusion of freedom and assurances of safety from your government is more important to you than actual freedom. 

And just because we can’t imagine our current leaders have sinister intentions for such programs, what about the powerful lobbying groups that have their ear? What about 20 years from now if a popular protest vote puts a right wing political group in power and they have immediate, fully legal access to this state apparatus. How easily they could deal with their political opponents.

Those determined to do others harm will find a way. The current massive surveillance operation did not prevent the murder of Lee Rigby or the Boston Marathon bombing - and after these events, patriotic politicians readily agree with military intelligence chiefs telling us they need more concessions to our liberties in order to prevent future attacks. Then another attack happens and they tell us it might have been prevented if they had even more powers. Perhaps we are allowing ourselves to be terrorised. To me, it is the job of the security services and lawmakers to find and stop those individuals without altering the framework of our democracy. The scope of the PRISM project is so far beyond what we should accept from our governments and we need to get mad.

I don’t care what everyone else says; I think it took an enormous amount of courage for Donald Trump to appear in front of the world with his Major Announcement. We need more honest people like Donald.

I don’t care what everyone else says; I think it took an enormous amount of courage for Donald Trump to appear in front of the world with his Major Announcement. We need more honest people like Donald.